In 15 words or less, complete the sentence “I wish my mentor knew…” by leaving a comment below.
Comments will receive anonymous responses from a Mentor Review Panel of experienced researchers from around the country. The following career levels correspond to their associated color.
- Yellow: Undergraduate Students
- Blue: Graduate Students & PHD Candidates
- Green: Postdoctoral Researchers
- Pink: Junior Faculty
- Orange: Senior Faculty
- Purple: Non-Faculty Researcher
To view a list of the members of the Mentor Review Panel, click here.
By participating as a contributor of comments to this thread, you agree to the following:
- Please leave your comments anonymously; the spirit of this forum is to freely exchange ideas around the improvement of mentorship outcomes in a safe space where commenters can be candid (yet positive), without fear of retaliation or undue personal attention directed at them as a result of their comment(s).
If you would like to continue the conversation within the NRMN Community in a non-anonymous way, we invite you to join the open MyNRMN discussion Group entitled “I Wish My Mentor Knew.” Find it by logging in to your NRMNet.net account and navigating to the MyNRMN app through the button on your Member Homepage.
- Do not mention other individuals by name or University in your post (e.g. say “my Chemistry lab mentor” and not “Dr. John Smith, who supervises me in my lab at the Chemistry Department here at Boston College”).
- This forum is designed for the sharing of comments that are candid, yet constructive. Comments that are accusatory, inflammatory, or otherwise overtly offensive or potentially offensive to an individual, will not be posted.
- Comments are subject to review and approval by NRMN before they become visible. NRMN will post selected comments anonymously to this page, including “#WishMyMentorKnew.” NRMN reserves the right to edit comments to ensure anonymity (for the author as well as individuals described), for grammar, for clarity, and/or to safeguard against comments being misinterpreted as offensive.
- NRMN may also share anonymous comments across NRMN social media channels.
- By submitting a comment, you agree that you have read and agree to follow these Guidelines, as well as the Code of Conduct posted below.
Code of Conduct “Netiquette”
Before you hit SEND, check these golden rules:
1. Think before you write. Is your message relevant and appropriate?
2. Think after you write. Re-read your message. Is it clear, concise and (again) relevant? Off-topic comments are usually not a problem but then start a new subject (see 5 below).
3. Write clearly and in paragraphs (though 1-paragraph submissions are best): entire screens of text are off-putting. “White space” separates your ideas, makes it easier to quote selectively (see #7 below) and encourages recipients to read your message in full.
4. When you hit Reply, it does not only go back to the person you are replying to; remember that your reply will be visible to the public.
5. If you are referencing another message in your own, consider mentioning the exact subject title of that message so others are clear which one you are referring to.
6. Write for the lowest common denominator.
7. Break one of these rules rather than go against your COMMON SENSE – the best guide to (n)etiquette ever discovered.
Adapted from: The Dummies’ Guide to Listserv Netiquette
By Nigel Caplan, University of Pennsylvania English Language Programs
The Dummies’ Guide to Listserv Netiquette was prepared by Nigel Caplan (firstname.lastname@example.org) for EV Online 2003,
and may be freely distributed, providing this acknowledgement is included.
This public forum is brought to you through our partnership with Keystone Symposia, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization with a 45-year history of convening open, peer-reviewed conferences that connect the scientific community and accelerate life science discovery.